tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24849079.post5107697351491629996..comments2016-12-03T17:19:29.778-06:00Comments on Science in the Backwater: 2348 B.C.LeeSawyerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15859491784749069444noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24849079.post-36765422114516168482016-12-03T17:19:29.778-06:002016-12-03T17:19:29.778-06:00It's foolish to think that bible chronology an...It's foolish to think that bible chronology and evolutionary chronology can be compared. Either one or the other can be true. If you were looking for agreement the world is millions of years old, and that ancient cultures evolved over thousands of years you can't rest assured that is the mainstream accepted teaching. But it's foolish to compare that to biblical timelines. The dating of ancient cultures, is based on carbon dating which assumes the world evolved for millions of years. THE BIBLE does not accept evolution as a model of creation so of course it won't align to those timelines. IF YOU THINK "what we know" is somehow accurate then you are fooling yourself and placing blind trust in science without understanding how little we know of those periods, and how "surprised" we are of the sudden emergence of civilisation, writing, and language, and the sudden spread of animals from the middle east across the globe. None of this is to be expected based on evolutionary theories, which is why they are surprised. GKellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18317319180635938961noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24849079.post-1708612466857457982013-08-08T17:37:58.845-05:002013-08-08T17:37:58.845-05:00Thank you for this. It was just what I was looking...Thank you for this. It was just what I was looking for. snsb18https://www.blogger.com/profile/06792213679583320825noreply@blogger.com